Pennsylvania Judiciary Ethics Scandal: Judge’s Actions Raise Serious Concerns

Judges gavel on a wooden block courtroom setting
Legislation and law. Judge's gavel. Procedure for making laws. Сourt hearing. Judge’s verdict. Symbol law. Constitutional court.

Pennsylvania magistrate judge Sonya McKnight was convicted of attempted homicide after shooting her ex-boyfriend in the head while he slept, raising serious questions about judicial ethics and oversight.

Key Insights

  • McKnight was found guilty of attempted homicide and aggravated assault for shooting her ex-boyfriend Michael McCoy in the head after he asked her to move out of his home.
  • The judge had a troubling history, including a prior suspension without pay for misconduct and a previous shooting incident involving her estranged husband that was ruled self-defense.
  • Jurors deliberated for only two hours before convicting McKnight, who now faces up to 60 years in prison with sentencing scheduled for May 28.
  • The case highlights critical concerns about the vetting process for judicial positions and the need for more rigorous ethical standards within the judiciary.

A Judge’s Shocking Fall from the Bench

Sonya McKnight, a Pennsylvania magistrate judge elected to the Dauphin County bench in 2016, now faces up to six decades behind bars after a jury convicted her of attempted homicide and aggravated assault. The shocking case involves McKnight shooting her ex-boyfriend, Michael McCoy, in the head while he slept on February 10, 2024. The incident occurred at McCoy’s home, where McKnight had been living despite his repeated requests for her to leave. The Delaware County jury needed just two hours of deliberation to reach their verdict following a two-day trial.

McCoy provided damning testimony during the trial, recalling that McKnight’s final words before the shooting were, “Oh, so you’re serious,” after he had asked her to move out. Upon waking to excruciating pain, McCoy initially believed he was experiencing a medical emergency. “I thought I was having a brain aneurysm,” McCoy testified, noting that he couldn’t see after being shot but was certain McKnight was the only other person present in the home at the time of the shooting.

A Pattern of Misconduct and Violence

McKnight’s conviction marks the culmination of a troubled judicial career marked by previous misconduct allegations. She had already been suspended without pay in November 2023 after the Judicial Conduct Board accused her of violating probation from a previous misconduct case. That earlier case involved a 2020 traffic stop involving her son, raising serious questions about her judgment and professional ethics. More alarming was the revelation that this wasn’t McKnight’s first shooting incident.

“We are pleased with the jury’s verdict. This was a hard-fought trial that ultimately came down to the credibility of the victim. He is a walking miracle.” – Seán McCormack, Cumberland County District Attorney

In 2019, McKnight shot her estranged husband in an incident that was ultimately deemed self-defense, resulting in no charges being filed. This pattern of violent behavior raises serious concerns about the vetting process for judicial candidates and the mechanisms in place to identify potentially dangerous individuals before they assume positions of power within our justice system. Cumberland County District Attorney Seán McCormack expressed satisfaction with the jury’s decision, highlighting the severity of McKnight’s actions.

A Miraculous Survival and Search for Justice

Medical testimony proved crucial in the case against McKnight. Dr. Steven Allen, who treated McCoy after the shooting, testified that the bullet’s trajectory was critical to the victim’s survival. Prosecutors argued that McKnight was a jealous partner who reacted violently to rejection, while her defense attempted to cast doubt on the identification of the shooter. However, the circumstances and evidence proved too overwhelming for McKnight’s defense to overcome.

“Oh, so you’re serious” – Michael McCoy

The conviction of a sitting judge for such a violent crime sends shockwaves through Pennsylvania’s judicial system and raises important questions about judicial temperament and character requirements. With McKnight’s sentencing scheduled for May 28, this case serves as a stark reminder that those entrusted to uphold and interpret the law must themselves be held to the highest standards of personal conduct. Her conviction highlights the critical importance of thorough background checks and psychological evaluations for judicial candidates to ensure the integrity of our courts remains unimpeachable.

Sources:

  1. Pennsylvania judge accused of shooting her ex-boyfriend as he slept is convicted of attempted homicide
  2. Pennsylvania judge convicted of shooting ex-boyfriend in head as he slept

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR